ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech and the viral vector vaccines from Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE). Method(s): From July 2020 to July 2021, we consecutively included adult outpatients with confirmed epilepsy. These PWE were interviewed about COVID-19 infections and vaccinations. Results of follow-up visits were added until the cut-off date (December 31, 2021). The data of COVID-19-infected without vaccinations or fully vaccinated PWE without COVID-19 infections were analyzed. Full vaccination was defined as a double vaccination with the Pfizer/BionTech, Moderna, or Astra Zeneca vaccines or a single Johnson & Johnson vaccination. Result(s): At cut-off, 612 of 1152 PWE fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 51 PWE had been infected without vaccination and 561 had full vaccination without infection. Among the infected PWE, 76.5% presented with symptoms;9.8% had a severe course (one death). The leading symptoms were influenza-like disorders (48.7% of infected PWE with symptoms), anosmia (28.2%), and ageusia (20.5%). Seizure increases or relapses after sustained seizure freedom occurred in 7.8%. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 113 vaccinated PWE (20.1% of all vaccinated PWE). The leading AEs were fatigue, fever, and headache. The AE rate per vaccine was 14.0% for Pfizer/BionTech, 32.7% for Moderna, 25.8% for Astra Zeneca, and 46.2% for Johnson & Johnson. Of the AEs, 93.3% lasted <=1 week. Seizure increase or relapse occurred in 1.4% and was significantly less frequent than in the infected group (p= 0.0016). Conclusion(s): The course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the vaccines were similar as in the general population, yet, seizure worsening occurred more often after the infection than after the vaccination.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, part of Springer Nature.
ABSTRACT
In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Varenox is the first locally manufactured and approved biosimilar in Algeria. It is an enoxaparin sodium (ES) with established good analytical characterization and manufacturing quality control. The aim of the PROPHYVAR study was to generate real-life data in routine practices and to assess the safety and tolerability in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Method(s): This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study, conducted between April 2021 and May 2022. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to the study drug. A sample size of 500 patients was calculated to estimate the proportion of patients with AEs. Assuming that approximately 10% will be lost to follow-up or not evaluable, 550 patients were needed to describe the impact of Varenox use. Result(s): The study was conducted in 25 different sites in Algeria, in 4 therapeutic areas: ICU, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and nephrology;550 patients were included and received at least one injection of Varenox. The mean age was 47 years, women in majority (62.5%). The patients were overweight or obese (53%), with a history of arterial hypertension (25%), diabetes (7.5%) and renal failure (6.4%). Reasons for hospitalization were mainly fracture (15.5%), pregnancy (8.3%), COVID-19 (7%) or cancer (7%). The majority of patients were treated at prophylactic dose of 0.4ml (80%) or 0.6ml (10%). The median duration of follow-up was 24 days. A total of 38 patients experienced at least one AE (6.9%, CI95=[4.9%;9.4%]). Related AEs were reported in 10 patients (1.8%), mainly in nephrology (N=7 arterio-venous fistula). VTE events were reported in 6 patients (1.1%, CI95=[0.2%;2%]). Conclusion(s): This study suggests that Varenox is safe in the prophylaxis of VTE. To our knowledge this is the first large study describing the use of ES in current medical practice in Algeria.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The problem of prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMRD) remains highly relevant. The presence of IRD is associated with a high risk of disease and severe course of COVID-19 during immunosuppressive treatment, primarily anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX), and a low level of post-vaccination response in such patients. A new strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 are virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to coronavirus;currently, combined long-acting monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) are registered for prevention in the world and the Russian Federation. . Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (TC) show neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2, including the Omicron strain, primarily its variants BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.75 ("Centaur"). Objective - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TC for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in rheumatic patients receiving RTX, based on a prospective observational study. Materials and methods. The main group included 86 patients with various IMRD receiving RTX: 50 of them had ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AAV), 15 - rheumatoid arthritis, 9 - Sjogren's syndrome (SS), 4 - IgG4-related disease, 3 - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 - dermatomyositis (DM), 2 - systemic scleroderma (SSD). Median age was 59 (19-82) years;male: female ratio - 1:1,8. From March 26 to August 30 2022, patients received a single intramuscular injection of TC in a total dose of 300 mg, mainly after RTX (in 52% of cases, in 28% on the next day after RTX). The control group included 42 patients with AAV (median age - 45 (35-71) years;male: female ratio - 1:1), also treated with RTX, who did not receive pre-exposure prophylaxis of TC. The duration of observation was 7 months, until November 1 2022. At this time, 98% of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the Russian Federation were Omicron. A telephone and/or online survey of patient has been conducted to detect cases of COVID-19 and adverse reactions. Results. In the TC group, confirmed coronavirus infection have been detected in 17 (20%) patients (AAV - 10, SS - 3, SSD - 2, SLE - 1, DM - 1), with fever in 7 (8%), only in one case hospitalization was required (lung damage was not detected in computed tomography), in two cases, according to CT mild lung damage (CT 1-2), there were no deaths. Good TC's tolerability was noted, signs not associated with COVID-19 or progression of IMRD after administration of TC were observed in 8 (9%) patients (GPA - 3 MPA - 1, RA - 2, SLE - 1, IgG4-related disease - 1), adverse reactions definitely associated with the use of TC were not found. The most serious event not associated with coronavirus infection was the progression of polyneuropathy in a patient with RA. In the control group, 3 (7%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, one with severe lung injury (CT 3, pulmonary embolism) and death. Conclusions. The data of clinical studies and our own clinical experience evidence the effectiveness of the use of a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies TC (Evusheld), registered for indications for pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Patients with IMRD treated with RTX have a favorable safety profile of TC. The introduction of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, a new drug class for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, opens significant prospects for improving the prognosis of patients with IRD.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
COVID-hospital healthcare workers belong to a high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium (Galavit) belongs to the group of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs. It has been shown that aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium is effective in the prevention of acute respiratory infections, respiratory tract diseases and ENT-organs of bacterial and viral etiology. The purpose of the study. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of immunoprophylaxis of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) with aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium in healthcare workers providing medical care in the "red zone". Material and methods. A multicenter prospective-retrospective observational comparative non-randomized study in healthcare workers providing medical care in the "red zone" was conducted. 428 participants were included in the study: the observation group - healthcare workers who administered aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium (Galavit) for prophylactic purposes (n=214), and control group (n=214). The observation period of the participants or the period of collecting retrospective data in the study was 30 days. The results of PCR tests and tests for antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed, clinical status (COVID-19 in any form) was assessed. Descriptive statistic methods and Pearson chi2 test were used. The risk ratios, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with them. The influence of potential confounding factors (age, gender, work place in clinical site, the presence or absence of concomitant disease) on the clinical status were analyzed using logistic regression. The analysis of propensity score matching was carried out. The Stata/IC 14.2 for Windows software used for statistical analysis. Results and discussion. Observational study results describe the risk ratios and odds ratios of infection with a new coronavirus (COVID-19) in healthcare workers providing medical care in the "red zone" considering prophylactic administration of aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium (Galavit). 205 (95.8%) participants in the group of healthcare workers who took aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium (Galavit) for prophylactic purposes and 194 (90.7%) participants in control group had a negative PCR test during the observation period, chi2=4.48, p=0.034. The risk of a positive status according to the PCR test for 30 days in the preventive group was 0,04, and in the control group 0.09. The risk difference was -0.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.099;-0.004]. The adjusted odds ratio using multiple logistic regression was - 0.41 (95% CI 0.18-0.93). No adverse events were observed during the prophylactic administration of aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium over 30 days. Conclusion. Galavit preventive administration in a tablet form at a dose of 50-100 mg per day by employees of medical institutions providing medical care to patients with CIVID-19 significantly reduces the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and more than 2 times increases the chances not ill of new coronavirus infection. Galavit administration up to 30 days at a dose of 50-100 mg was well tolerated, no adverse events were registered.Copyright © 2022 by the authors.
ABSTRACT
Intro: VLA2001 is a highly-purified, inactivated whole-virus SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on a dual-adjuvant system of Alum and CpG1018 for induction of a robust immune response. The vaccine was designed using a well-established technology platform and has received full marketing authorization in Europe. In a pivotal Phase 3 trial, VLA2001 demonstrated superior neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) to the comparator, AstraZeneca's AZD1222, as well as non-inferior seroconversion rates two weeks after priming. The extension of the Phase 3 trial evaluated safety and immunogenicity of homologous and heterologous booster vaccinations of VLA2001. Method(s): This is a randomized observer-blind controlled, pivotal trial conducted in the UK in participants aged >=18 years who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive two doses of VLA2001 or AZD1222, 28 days apart. A booster with VLA2001 was administered to eligible participants at 7 to 8 months after priming. The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of any adverse event following the booster vaccination. The primary immunogenicity outcomes were the GMT and fold increase of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 two weeks after the booster vaccination. The study is registered under NCT04864561. Finding(s): A booster dose of VLA2001 is well-tolerated in both AZD1222 and VLA2001 primed participants. High neutralizing antibody titers and fold- increases were generated two weeks following a booster of VLA2001. Cross- neutralizing serological responses against Delta and the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 variants of concern are elicited following a homologous or heterologous booster dose in VLA2001 or AZD1222 primed participants, respectively. Additionally, VLA2001 induced broad T-cell responses with antigen-specific IFN-gamma producing T-cells against the Spike, the Nucleocapsid and the Membrane protein. Conclusion(s): Homologous and heterologous booster doses of VLA2001 demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile irrespective of priming and induced broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral virus and variants of concern, including the currently circulating BA.4/BA.5.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: The tolerability of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among people living with HIV (PLWH) has been understudied in vaccine trials. CoVPN 3008 (Ubuntu) is the largest multicenter Phase 3 efficacy trial of mRNA vaccines in sub-Saharan Africa. Method(s): We enrolled adults age >=18 years living with HIV or another comorbidity associated with severe COVID-19. Previously vaccinated individuals were excluded. Baseline testing included HIV, CD4 count and HIV viral load (VL) (if HIV+), anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). All participants receive vaccinations at months 0 and 6, and SARS-CoV-2 seronegative individuals also receive vaccination at month 1. This analysis includes mRNA-1273 vaccinations at months 0 and 1. Reactogenicity (solicited adverse events [AEs]) was assessed among a representative subset of participants (Safety Subset, SS) for 7 days post-vaccination. Baseline characteristics associated with moderate/severe reactogenicity events were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Result(s): 14002 participants were enrolled in the trial (1510 into the SS) at 46 sites from 2 Dec 2021 to 9 Sep 2022. At baseline in the SS, 71% (1065) were female, median age 38 years (IQR 32-46), and median BMI 25.0 (IQR 20.7-30.2). 73% (1108) were SARS-CoV-2 seropositive, and 8.7% (131) had a positive nasal NAAT swab. 16% (197) had a history of tuberculosis. 84% (1267) were PLWH, with median CD4 count of 614 cells/muL (IQR 414-861);7.8% had CD4 count < 200. 21% (238) had detectable HIV VL (>=50 copies/mL), with median VL 1660 (IQR 182-23932). 14% (172/1262) and 12% (64/542) of PLWH reported moderate/severe reactogenicity after the 1st and 2nd vaccination (Figure), with no hospitalizations. Female PLWH and CD4 count >500 had 35% (p=0.03) and 44% (p=0.04) increased odds of moderate/severe reactogenicity, respectively. Other baseline characteristics were not associated with the odds of reporting moderate/severe reactogenicity among PLWH after 1st vaccination. Similar trends were seen after the 2nd vaccination, but none reached statistical significance. In multivariate models, female sex remained associated with increased odds of moderate/severe reactogenicity after the 2nd vaccination. Conclusion(s): Similar to observations in HIV-negative populations, mRNA-1273 was well tolerated by PLWH with more reactogenicity in females. Impaired inflammatory responses among participants with CD4 counts < 500 cell/muL may explain less moderate/severe reactions.
ABSTRACT
Evaluate the safety and tolerability of losmapimod in the treatment for FSHD. FSHD is a relentless, variably progressive disease leading to accumulation of disability over decades. Fulcrum is developing losmapimod, a small molecule p38 alpha/beta MAPK inhibitor, to treat FSHD. Losmapimod has been generally well-tolerated in more than 3,600 subjects across multiple clinical studies, including >100 subjects with FSHD. Fulcrum has assessed losmapimod in FSHD in one completed phase 1 study (FIS 001-2018) and two ongoing Phase 2 studies in the open label extension period (FIS 001-2019 and FIS 002-2019). Subjects aged 18-65 years with genetically confirmed FSHD1, clinical severity score 2-4, and MRI-eligible muscles for biopsy were exposed to losmapimod 7.5 or 15 mg twice daily PO for 14 days and up to 76 weeks. In study FIS 001-2018, 6 subjects were exposed to 7.5 mg and 11 subjects to 15 mg twice daily dosing for 14 consecutive days. In studies FIS 001-2019 and FIS 002-2019, 14 and 77 subjects respectively, received at least one dose of losmapimod 15 mg twice daily for up to 76 weeks. A total of 108 subjects with FSHD1 have been exposed to losmapimod, with approximately 131 patient-years of exposure. Fifty-seven subjects have been exposed to losmapimod for 12 to 18 months, and 30 have been exposed for over 18 months. Most adverse events (AEs) observed during the studies were considered of mild to moderate in severity. The most common AEs were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase, headache, dizziness, dry skin, eczema and gastrointestinal disorders. The majority of AEs resolved with continued dosing. Dosing has been paused for 14 days in four subjects (3 in FIS 001-2019 and 1 in FIS 002-2019) subjects due to COVID-19 infection. There were no reported drug related SAEs, deaths, discontinuations due to AEs, or clinically significant changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory results, or ECG parameters. Losmapimod given as up to 15 mg twice daily in >100 subjects with FSHD1 for up to 76 weeks has been generally well-tolerated, consistent with that previously reported in other patient populations. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of losmapimod for the treatment of FSHD remains favorable.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Objective. To comparatively assess the early toxicity of treatment, its tolerability, 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival, and local regional control rates in a group of patients receiving a radical cycle of accelerated or conventional fractionation chemoradiotherapy. Subjects and methods. The paper presents the interim results of a prospective study that included 115 patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx, tongue root, and larynx who received a radical cycle of conformal chemoradiotherapy using accelerated (the single focal dose (SFD) was 2.4 Gy for 25-26 fractions) or conventional (SFD was 2.0 Gy for 32-33 fractions) fractionation in the period from 2015 to 2020. Results. An analysis comparing the study group with the control one revealed no statistically significant differences in the level of early toxicity of treatment (p=0.41). Complete tumor reversal was achieved in 57 (86.3%) patients in the study group and in 39 (79.5%) in the comparison group (p=0.23). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local regional control rates in the accelerated fractionation group was 78.3+/-5.3%;65.9+/-6.8%, and 54.5+/-9.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 80.4+/-7.4%. These rates did not differ statistically from those in the conventional radiotherapy group (p=0.12-0.82);53 (80.3%) patients in the study group and 37 (75.5%) in the standard fractionation group received a radiation cycle without a forced interval. The treatment interval in the patients of both groups reduced the 2-year local regional control rates by 30.2% compared to that in the continuous cycle group (p=0.02). Conclusion. Accelerated fractionation chemoradiotherapy (SFD was 2.4 Gy for 25-26 fractions, the daily focal dose was 60.0- 62.4 Gy) is a procedure comparable with conventional radiation in its direct efficiency and safety. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this regimen can be considered to be a mainstay for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer in order to preserve the previous volumes of specialized healthcare.Copyright © A.V. SEMENOV I.A. GULIDOV O.G. LEPILINA M.U. RADZHAPOVA F.E. SEVRYUKOV K.B. GORDON.
ABSTRACT
Background: ASC10 is an oral double prodrug of the active antiviral ribonucleoside analog, ASC10-A (also known as beta-d-N4-hydroxycytidine), which is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. ASC10 is rapidly metabolized into ASC10-A in vivo after oral dosing. Here, we report the results of the first-in-human, phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ASC10 in healthy subjects, and to assess the food effect on the pharmacokinetics. Method(s): This study included 2 parts. Part 1 (multiple-ascending-dose) consisted of 6 cohorts (8 or 12 subjects per cohort). Eligible subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either twice-daily (BID) doses of 50 to 800 mg ASC10 or placebo for 5.5 days, and were then followed for 7 days for safety. In Part 2 (food effect), 12 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 800 mg ASC10 in the fed state followed by 800 mg in the fasted state, or vice versa, with a 7-day washout period between doses. PK blood samples were collected and measured for ASC10-A along with ASC10 and molnupiravir. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), measurement of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations. Result(s): ASC10-A was the major circulating metabolite ( >99.94%) in subjects after oral dosing of ASC10. ASC10-A appeared rapidly in plasma, with a median Tmax of 1.00 to 2.00 h, and declined with a geometric t1/2 of approximately 1.10 to 3.04 h. After multiple dosing for 5.5 days, both Cmax and AUC of ASC10-A increased in a dose-proportional manner from doses of 50 to 800 mg BID without accumulation. of ASC10-A in the fed state occurred slightly later, with a median of 3.99 h postdose versus 2.00 h (fasted state). However, Cmax and AUC were very similar or the same between fed and fasted states. Thus, administration of ASC10 with food is unlikely to have an effect on exposure. The incidence of AEs was similar between subjects receiving ASC10 or placebo (both 66.7%) and 95.0% of AEs were mild. There were no serious adverse events as well as no clinically significant findings in clinical laboratory, vital signs, or electrocardiography. Conclusion(s): Results of this study showed that ASC10 was well tolerated, and the increase in plasma exposure of ASC10-A was dose proportional across the range of doses tested with no accumulation and no food effect. 800 mg ASC10 BID is selected for further studies in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
Background: The currently approved vaccines do not induce sterilizing immunity against SAR-CoV-2 infection, and immunity wanes over time. A robust broad spectrum topical prophylaxis strategy could protect vulnerable populations in the face of continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2. The algal antiviral lectin Griffithsin (GRFT), and an engineered oxidation-resistant variant Q-GRFT have robust entry inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV variants of concern, in addition to other respiratory viruses with pandemic potential. We designed a nasal spray to deliver Q-GRFT to the upper respiratory tract mucosa for on-demand use as a broad-spectrum prophylactic. Two clinical trials (Phase 1a and 1b) were conducted to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Q-GRFT nasal spray in healthy adults. Method(s): Healthy adult volunteers were enrolled in a Phase 1a double blinded, randomized study to receive a single dose of either intranasal Q-GRFT (3.0 mg, 2 sprays per nostril) or placebo at 2:1 ratio. Following a safety review, the Phase 1b study was initiated. Eleven volunteers in Group 1 received 3.0 mg dose once daily, for 7 days. After a safety review, 11 volunteers in Group 2 received a total of 6.0 mg Q-GRFT (3.0 mg twice daily for 7 days). Topical Q-GRFT concentrations were measured by ELISA in collected nasal and nasopharyngeal fluids. Drug levels in plasma were assayed to determine systemic exposure. Viral microneutralization cytopathic effect (CPE) assays were performed against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA-5 and MERS-CoV. Result(s): Eighteen adults (24-54 years;Males 58.3%, Females 41.7%;12 Q-GRFT, 6 Placebo), and 22 adults (aged 23-59 years;Males 52.4%, Females 47.6%) were enrolled in Phase 1a and 1b, respectively. In Phase 1a, a single dose of Q-GRFT maintained quantifiable levels in nasal passages and nasopharynx for up to 24 hours. Similarly, Q-GRFT was quantifiable in nasal and nasopharyngeal regions in the Phase 1b study. No dose accumulation effect or systemic exposure was observed. Nasal and nasopharyngeal swab eluates inhibited SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and MERS-CoV in CPE assays. Q-GRFT did not modify olfactory sensation. No severe adverse events were reported. Thus, the nasal spray was deemed safe. Conclusion(s): Intranasal Q-GRFT was safe and enhanced mucosal SARSCoV-2 inhibitory activity in human volunteers. The results support further development of Q-GRFT as a broad-spectrum prophylactic against coronaviruses to curb ongoing infections, and for future pandemic preparedness.
ABSTRACT
Background: Ensitrelvir is a SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor approved in Japan under emergency regulatory approval system as an oral treatment for COVID-19. Here we report the key analysis results of 125 mg group of phase3 part (SCORPIO-SR). Method(s): This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and presence of risk factors for severe disease, patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours from onset were randomized to oral administration of ensitrelvir 125 mg (375 mg loading dose on Day1), ensitrelvir 250 mg (750 mg loading dose on Day1), and placebo once daily, for 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to resolution of 5 symptoms of COVID-19 (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, cough, feeling hot or feverish, and low energy or tiredness), and the key secondary endpoints include change from baseline on Day4 in the amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and time to first negative of viral titer. The primary population for the primary and key secondary endpoints was patients with <72 hours from onset to randomization. Result(s): Median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=336, 167.9 hours) than placebo group (n=321, 192.2 hours) (p=0.0407). Mean change of viral RNA levels from baseline (log10 copies/mL) on Day4 was significantly greater in 125 mg group (-2.48) than in placebo group (-1.01) (p< 0.0001). The time to first negative of viral titer was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=199, 36.2 hours) compared to placebo group (n=211, 65.3 hours) (p< 0.0001). Mean changes from baseline in viral titers [log10(TCID50)/mL] were significantly greater in 125mg group on Day2 (-0.807, n=196) and Day4 (-1.108, n=197) than in the placebo group (-0.395, n=208 and -0.850, n=207, respectively) (p< 0.0001). (Table Presented) In the patients randomized within 120 hours of onset, median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was 189.7 hours in 125 mg group (n=582) and 200.3 hours in placebo group (n=572) (p=0.4352). No deaths or serious adverse drug reactions were reported in either group, and the incidence of serious adverse events between the two groups was comparable. Conclusion(s): Ensitrelvir demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to resolution of 5 typical symptoms of COVID-19, robust antiviral effects and good tolerability.
ABSTRACT
Clinical parameters characterizing the efficacy and safety of favipiravir were examined in a multicenter, non-interventional (before-and-after study design) trial in 264 patients with mild COVID-19. It is shown that on the background of 14-day therapy with favipiravir body temperature normalized, blood oxygen saturation improved, and the frequency of tachycardia detection reduced by 16% (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease by 91,3% (p 0.0001) in the frequency of SARS-nCoV-2 RNA detection in the nasopharyngeal mucosa discharge was revealed. A decrease in the concentration of ferritin (by 69% compared to initial values), blood glucose (by 21%), creatinine (by 10%), C-reactive protein (by 36%) (p 0.0001), and D-dimer by 61% (p = 0.016) was noted. The results of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire revealed a significant (p 0.05) improvement in the quality of life in terms of physical functioning (by 35%), and role functioning associated with physical and emotional state by 107% and 160%, respectively. Analysis of the COV19-QoL questionnaire revealed a decrease by 24% in negative perception of the disease (p < 0,01). Among the identified adverse events, elevated level of ALT (in 39.47% of patients), hyperuricemia (in 28.95% of patients), and elevated AST (in 23.68% of patients) prevailed. All the adverse events occurred with mild or moderate severity. There were no lethal outcomes in the studied sample of patients. The analysis showed a satisfactory level of the tolerability of the treatment.Copyright © 2023 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Clinical parameters characterizing the efficacy and safety of favipiravir were examined in a multicenter, non-interventional (before-and-after study design) trial in 264 patients with mild COVID-19. It is shown that on the background of 14-day therapy with favipiravir body temperature normalized, blood oxygen saturation improved, and the frequency of tachycardia detection reduced by 16% (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease by 91,3% (p 0.0001) in the frequency of SARS-nCoV-2 RNA detection in the nasopharyngeal mucosa discharge was revealed. A decrease in the concentration of ferritin (by 69% compared to initial values), blood glucose (by 21%), creatinine (by 10%), C-reactive protein (by 36%) (p 0.0001), and D-dimer by 61% (p = 0.016) was noted. The results of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire revealed a significant (p 0.05) improvement in the quality of life in terms of physical functioning (by 35%), and role functioning associated with physical and emotional state by 107% and 160%, respectively. Analysis of the COV19-QoL questionnaire revealed a decrease by 24% in negative perception of the disease (p < 0,01). Among the identified adverse events, elevated level of ALT (in 39.47% of patients), hyperuricemia (in 28.95% of patients), and elevated AST (in 23.68% of patients) prevailed. All the adverse events occurred with mild or moderate severity. There were no lethal outcomes in the studied sample of patients. The analysis showed a satisfactory level of the tolerability of the treatment.Copyright © 2023 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: Bladder preservation is routinely used as an alternative to radical cystectomy in the UK and is becoming more accepted elsewhere globally. The gold standard is for patients to receive radiotherapy with a radiosensitiser most commonly concurrent chemotherapy e.g. 5FU/mitomycin C, gemcitabine or cisplatin. Patients with poor performance status or comorbidities may be unable to be offered concurrent treatment with chemotherapy but alternative treatment with concurrent carbogen +/- nicotinamide as a hypoxic modifier may be of benefit. Our aim therefore was to retrospectively review patients with bladder TCC treated with radical radiotherapy alone in the last 5 years who may have benefited from carbogen +/- nicotinamide radiosensitisation at a large cancer centre in the north of England. Material(s) and Method(s): In this single institution retrospective case note review, electronic records were reviewed for 175 patients who had received radiotherapy to the bladder for TCC between 2017-2022. Patients who had radical radiotherapy (RT) alone without radiosensitisation were scrutinised to ascertain whether they would have been candidates for carbogen and nicotinamide using the inclusion/exclusion criteria previously defined in the Bladder Carbogen Nicotinamide (BCON) Randomised Phase 3 trial. Result(s): We analysed 175 patients. Of these, 133 received had radical RT without radiosensitisation. The most common reason for not offering radiosensitisation was the presence of co-morbidities (27.8%). Of interest, the proportion of patients having chemotherapy radiosensitisation did not change after COVID19 in March 2020 (21.5% pre- vs 27.5% post;p=0.32 chi2). Conversely, the proportion of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy reduced though failed to reach significance (12.6% pre- vs 5% post;p=0.08 chi2). After review of the notes and criteria from the original BCON trial, 106 patients (79.6%) could have benefited from carbogen +/- nicotinamide. Of these, 14 patients (13.2%) could have been offered carbogen alone due to poor renal function. The most common reason for not being eligible for BCON was respiratory disease with reduced respiratory drive (44%). Conclusion(s): The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) state that all radical RT for bladder TCC should be with a radiosensitiser. Due to logistical and departmental issues, the BCON regimen is not currently offered as a standard alternative to radiosensitisation with chemotherapy. BCON has been demonstrated to be tolerable and, whilst updated follow-up data failed to demonstrate statistical significance for overall survival (OS), meta-analysis of hypoxia modification has shown significant improvement in OS compared to RT alone. Hypoxia modification with carbogen +/- nicotinamide should be considered for all patients unsuitable for chemotherapy radiosensitisation.Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background. Pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID19) raises a smash barrier for clinicians and patients since 2 years. Limited information is available on disease course after COVID19 infection or vaccination in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Objective(s): The primary goals of the current research were to assess frequency and outcome of COVID19 disease and to determine the vaccination rate and effect in our IIM cohort. Secondary objectives were to search for risk factors of infection, predictive factors of hospitalization and to assess incidence of pots-vaccination adverse events and breakthrough infections. Methods. We identified the confirmed COVID19 positive patients and assessed disease course and outcome on 01/06/2021 in our cohort then patients were prospectively followed. Incidence and complications of infection and vaccination were determined by questionnaires and using the database. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein electrochemiluminescent immunoassay has been used to assess seroconversion. Disease activity was determined by physician global activity. Results. A total of 176 patients were screened and 101 participated in the study. By 01/06/2021, the COVID infection rate was 34.7%, which was significantly higher than the national prevalence at that time (8.2%). A third of these infections occurred asymptomatically or mild, but 20% of the infected patients were hospitalized, one patient died. Longer disease duration (8.67 vs. 17.87 years;p=0.003) and higher incidence of anti-Jo-1 antibody (57% vs. 10%;p=0.018) were significantly associated with hospitalization. All patients became seropositive after COVID19 infection regardless of immunosuppressive therapy or symptoms severity, meanwhile 72.3% of patients became seropositive after vaccination. Different vaccines induced various titer of antibody against the spike protein. Significantly higher antibody titers was detected after Pfizer-BioNTech (177.1 U / ml vs. 81.1 U / ml;p=0.001) and numerically lower ones after AstraZeneca (45.05 U/ml vs. 126.93 U/ml p=0.054) vaccination compared to others. Patients receiving steroid therapy had significantly decreased post-vaccination antibody response compared to those without steroid treatment (94.03 U/ml vs. 165.6 U/ ml;p=0.008). We did not found short term vaccine related major adverse events. Long term data by 15/02/2022 revealed more infections (42.57%), where anti-Jo1 positivity still showed significant association with hospitalization (50% vs. 9%;p=0.0103). Breakthrough infection was detected in 9,25 % of the vaccinated patients, which was significantly more often after Astra Zeneca vaccination (40 % vs. 7%, p=0.017). All the fatal (n=3) COVID infections occurred in patients with seronegativity to anti-spike protein regardless vaccination. We identified 7,4 % post vaccination disease relapse needing therapy changes and 24,7% new autoantibody positivity. Conclusions. Based on our results, myositis may be associated with an increased risk of COVID19 disease. Independent risk factor for hospitalization for unvaccinated people is anti-Jo1 positivity. Anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccines are safe, tolerable, could prevent complicated infections and strongly recommended for IIM population. Further investigation is required to assess clinical significance of post-vaccination disease flare.
ABSTRACT
Background Taletrectinib is a potent, next-generation, CNS-active, ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with selectivity over TRKB. In previous reports from TRUST-I, taletrectinib showed meaningful clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in pts with ROS1+ NSCLC (n = 109) regardless of crizotinib (CRZ) pretreatment status. We report updated efficacy and safety data with ~1.5 yr follow-up. Methods TRUST-I is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study with two cohorts: ROS1 TKI-naive and CRZ-pretreated. Pts in both cohorts received taletrectinib 600 mg QD. Key study endpoints included IRC-confirmed ORR (cORR), DoR, disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and safety. A pooled analysis of ORR, PFS, and safety including pts from additional clinical trials was also conducted. Results In the 109 pts from TRUST-I (enrolled prior to Feb 2022) the median follow-up was 18.0 mo in TKI-naive (n = 67) and 16.9 mo in CRZ-pretreated pts (n = 42). cORR was 92.5% in TKI-naive and 52.6% in CRZ-pretreated pts (table). Median DoR (mDoR) and mPFS were not reached. Intracranial-ORR was 91.6%;ORR in pts with G2032R was 80.0%. In a pooled analysis with phase I studies, ORR was 89.5% and 50.0% for TKI-naive and CRZ-pretreated pts, respectively;mPFS was 33.2 mo and 9.8 mo. In 178 pts treated at 600 mg QD, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 92.7%;most (64.0%) were grade 1-2. The most common TEAEs were increased AST (60.7%), increased ALT (55.6%), and diarrhea (55.6%). Neurological TEAEs (dizziness, 18.5%;dysgeusia, 12.4%) and discontinuations due to TEAEs (3.4%) were low. Further updated results will be presented. [Formula presented] Conclusions With additional follow-up, taletrectinib continued to demonstrate meaningful efficacy outcomes including high response rates, prolonged PFS, robust intracranial activity, activity against G2032R, and tolerable safety with low incidence of neurological AEs. Clinical trial identification NCT04395677. Editorial acknowledgement Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Arpita Kulshrestha of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc Legal entity responsible for the study AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc. Funding AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc. Disclosure S. He: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employment: AnHeart Therapeutics. T. Seto: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Kissei Pharmaceutical, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employment: Precision Medicine Asia;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau, Honoraria for lectures: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Covidien Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Towa Pharmaceutical. C. Zhou: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Innovent Biologics Qilu, Hengrui, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau, Payment or honoraria: Eli Lilly China, Sanofi, BI, Roche, MSD, Qilu, Hengrui, Innovent Biologics, C-Stone LUYE Pharma, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc, Amoy Diagnositics, AnHeart. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: Allergic rhinitis, one of the most common chronic allergic diseases, commonly associated with asthma, has a disease modifying therapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). AIT can play a significant role in the reduction of clinical and immunological reaction to the culprit allergen, decreasing the onset of new sensitizations, preventing the onset of asthma, and reducing use of pharmacological treatments. This latter aspect is highly relevant for adolescents, a category of patients that frequently prefer to use "as few drugs as possible". AIT continuation may be difficult in some situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Difficulty in accessing hospitals was experienced by many leading to a discontinuation of therapies for chronic conditions, such as allergic rhinitis. Method(s): We report our experience on the management, safety and adherence to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) prescribed to 25 adolescents affected by allergic rhinitis (house dust mite (HDM) -8 patients, SLIT grass pollen -12 patients, SLIT parietaria -5 patients), during the COVID-19 pandemic, following EAACI recommendations. The first administration of SLIT was carried out under medical supervision. We used a personalized monitoring approach according to the type of SLIT prescribed and according to the needs presented by each patient, advising them how to recognize and manage a possible reaction. Result(s): No immediate severe adverse reactions were reported by patients. Between the 2nd and 5th day of SLIT, 4 patients in therapy with HDM SLIT, experienced an exacerbation of rhinitis symptoms, with resolution after the use of oral antihistamine and topical cortisone+antihistamine before taking the daily dose of SLIT (for 30 days). Two patients on grass pollen SLIT and 2 patients on HDM SLIT, with gastric upset after taking SLIT daily while fasting, presented a resolution of the symptom after we advised them to take the daily dose in the morning after breakfast. Five patients interrupted SLIT for COVID-19 infection, until complete resolution. To date, all 25 patients are continuing SLIT, with good tolerability, with an improvement of rhinitis symptoms. Conclusion(s): We have reported real-life SLIT adherence and safety in adolescents that started SLIT during the COVID-19 pandemic to confirm how SLIT is a winning strategy and the only modifying treatment for allergic conditions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) are an inseparable part of multiple sclerosis (MS) management, which have dramatically changed the prognosis and course of the disease. A change during DMD therapy, which includes switching or stopping (temporary or permanent) medication, can manipulate the goals and has various causes such as side effects, ineffectiveness of treatment, patient's preference, presence of concurrent diseases and pregnancy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patterns and causes of DMD change in patients with MS (PwMS) in Tehran, Iran. The understanding will help us identify opportunities to improve adherence and ultimately patient outcomes and health system efficiency through effective education, and recognition of more tolerable or simpler regimens. The aim of this study is to identify rate and pattern of DMDs among PwMS in Tehran. Material(s) and Method(s): The study population of this cross-sectional was all PwMS in Tehran province who had changed their DMD for any reason in the last 5 years until June 2, 2022. The basic information was extracted through nationwide MS registry of Iran (NMSRI), Tehran, where all MS data including diagnosis had been confirmed by trained neurologists based on the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Moreover, supplementary unregistered data were gathered through telephone follow-ups carried out by 6 trained physicians with precise quality checks. The questionnaires covered 5 aspects of MS including demographics, disease history, diagnosis, progress and treatment. DMDs were classified into 10 general classes. All participants were asked to attribute the change to distinct categories following a written pre-existing consent. IBM SPSS (version 23) was used for statistical analysis. All the steps taken were in complete adherence with the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki. Result(s): Among 1999 enrolled patients with a mean age of 36.9+/-9.4 and total disease duration of 7.06+/-5.8 years, 1315 experienced change (Group 1) during study period, while 684 did not (Group 2). There was no difference in terms of demographic characteristics between the two groups. On the other hand, Group 1 had longer disease durations and more comorbidities (P <0.001). Getting infected with COVID-19 more than 4 times was observed to be significantly higher in Group 1 (P =0.032). Unlike Patients with PPMS and RRMS, SPMS patients showed higher EDSS scores when experiencing no DMD change. The most widely used DMDs were interferons, while ocrelizumab was the least used drug. Corona virus had the most effect on the change of ocrelizumab. Conclusion(s): DMD change generally occurs independent of socioeconomic level. Since most of the patients (65.8%) experienced DMD change, which serves as the biggest cost component in PwMS, the economic aspects of MS management in this field should be considered in the future.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib in children with severe atopic dermatitis. METHOD(S): This is an open-label, multiple-dose study. AD patients (n = 35) were enrolled into four cohorts (Cohort 1, 6 to <12 years, low dose;Cohort 2, 6 to <12 years, high dose;Cohort 3, 2 to <6 years, low dose;Cohort 4, 2 to <6 years, high dose). The low and high doses were selected based on body weight to provide comparable plasma exposure in pediatrics to 15 mg and 30 mg QD doses in adults, respectively. All patients continued on the low dose after the PK assessment on Study Day 7. Safety and exploratory efficacy parameters are assessed in the study. RESULT(S): Geometric mean Cmax and AUC over 0-24 hours at steady state were 33.1 ng/mL and 249 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 1, 95.5 ng/mL and 523 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 2, 35.2 ng/mL and 264 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 3, and 101 ng/mL and 625 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 4. Upadacitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common AEs were COVID infection, headache, and abdominal discomfort. No new safety risks were identified compared to the known safety profile for upadacitinib. In the 29 subjects with available interim efficacy results at week 12, 34.5% achieved validated Investigator's Global Assessment scale for AD score of 0 or 1 and 69.0% achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index by at least 75% at Week 12 with treatment of upadacitinib. CONCLUSION(S): The findings supported the use of current dosing regimens for further investigation of upadacitinib in upcoming phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric AD patients.